Hi @joyce , and thanks for the clear timeline. It’s genuinely appreciated, and I want to say upfront that the MCP server itself has been fantastic to work with. It’s been a core part of my workflow and I’d like to keep using it.
That said, I think my case (and I suspect others’) doesn’t fit neatly into the timeline you shared, and I wanted to lay it out in case it’s useful.
I moved to the Essential plan on July 11th. Between then and August 4th, before your stated “Essential experiment” window even started on August 5th, I was already using the MCP server continuously and without interruption, and I never held a Pro subscription at any point. So by the timeline you posted (MCP as Pro-only with a trial, pre-August 5th), my access during those three-plus weeks shouldn’t have worked at all but it did, reliably, the whole time.
That makes the August 5th–19th window feel like it doesn’t actually mark when my access to the MCP began, it began nearly a month earlier. So being excluded now, for having subscribed to Essential “too early” relative to a 15-day experiment window I wasn’t even aware was happening, feels like the wrong line to draw. If anything, users like me who’ve been paying Essential customers and active MCP users well before the experiment are being treated worse than users who happened to sign up during that particular fortnight.
On top of that, your own documentation still says something different from what’s happening. Right now, on WeWeb Pricing Plans | Documentation , it reads:
“Available on a 14-day trial on the Free seat plan. Paid seat plans include ongoing MCP access.”
Essential is a paid seat plan, and that line doesn’t single out Pro anywhere. So as of today, your own docs still promise exactly the access that’s currently being denied to Essential users.
I also want to echo what several others in this thread have already raised, because together it paints a consistent picture:
- No changelog entry, dashboard notice, or advance warning before the revert on the 20th, several of us only found out because our workflows broke that morning.
- The pricing page still lists MCP access as part of Essential in places, which is exactly the kind of confusion Faisal flagged on the 16th.
- andrewwinters made the same documentation point independently (“WeWeb’s current documentation states that paid seat plans include ongoing MCP access”), and Michael noted the pricing plans were stating “unlimited access to MCP” even after checking with someone from the team.
- The jump from Essential to Pro to regain MCP access is roughly 100% (~€20 to ~€50/month), which is a steep ask for something that was working fine on Essential for weeks with no notice it would be revoked.
Given the above, would it be possible to also honor Essential subscribers who had continuous MCP access before the August 5th window, not just those who signed up during it? And separately, could the docs and dashboard get updated to match whatever the actual policy is, since right now they still say something different from what’s being enforced?
Thanks again for engaging with this thread directly.. it does make a difference.